95K 49K 83K 7K 5.1K

Understanding Dental Implant Success, Survival, and Failure

Dental Implant

Dental implant dentistry has long been the golden standard of masticatory losses due to its durable nature and the possibility of it remaining functional for decades. However, making a thorough evaluation for an acceptable outcome is far deeper than just the placement of a dental implant. The question of implant survival should no longer remain restricted only to the dental professionals and patients. Instead, it should be expanded to embrace the more thorough concept of implant health and its long-term function. In this regard, it will be prudent to analyze your options with a practice employing such standards, for your Kleinburg Maple Dental Health implants are not meant to be a temporary fix, but a long-term investment in your oral well-being.

Historically, an implant has been assessed by a most basic measure: the implant remained in the mouth for a certain time period or not. This “survival rate” was the sole criterion used either in numerous studies or in clinical discussions. While a high survival rate might seem admirable, the evaluation system was grossly defective. Implants still counted as technically “surviving” during the years that they caused continual pain, a chronic infection, or searing bone loss. These problems did not bring about the immediate removal of the implant; nevertheless, from the standpoint of both the patient and the practitioner, this was an unsatisfactory and impaired outcome. Such instances called for another framework, one that could evaluate implant health more accurately and more meaningfully.

A Contemporary Framework for Implant Outcomes

The ICOI Pisa Consensus experts tackled the limitations of the old system with a four-tier classification scheme for dental implant outcomes. It provides a standardized and clinically meaningful definition of the implant condition, ranging from ideal through compromised to failure.

Success: The ultimate goal and ideal condition for any implant procedure. An implant is considered successful if there is absolutely no pain, no mobility, less than 2mm of crestal bone loss, and no history of infection. It is completely functional and stable, indistinguishable from a natural healthy tooth, and is a perfect long-term solution.

Satisfactory Survival: This describes an implant that still functions well in practice but in some way falls short of the ideal. There are no symptoms or mobility with this tier, but by definition, crestal bone loss is between 2 and 4mm. An implant within this category is still worthy of any restoration; however, it deserves careful observation concerning further progression of bone loss.

Compromised Survival: At this very critical warning stage, an implant is threatened and in dire need of attention. Bone loss of greater grade is deemed to be excessive: more than 4mm but less than 50% along the implant length. Although the loss lessens the foundation, no mobility, hence the future risk is high if immediate intervention does not take place.

Failure: This last category can be considered for final complete failure of the Implant system. Cases in which there is pain, mobility, or bone loss greater than 50% of the length of the implant are considered to be failures. Usually, these implants are either not restorable or have been removed. Alternative treatment options may require reconsideration by the patient.

The Importance of Detailed Diagnosis

This modern method of four classifications is highly important for the dental professional and the patient alike. For the dental professional, it clarifies and standardizes the terminology used to assess and report the health of implants which enable them to better address treatments and monitor over the long term. For the patient, it provides the ability to clearly understand the design of their implant health and what to expect for its treatment. By accepting this framework, a dental practice shows its commitment not only to placing the implants but also to ensuring their long-term health and functionality. When you select a provider, ruling out adherence to these detailed standards is an important step toward paving the road to a successful and permanent restoration.